[Ecoed] Re: Origin recommendation:

Sheila Strawn sastrawn at hotmail.com
Fri Jun 13 21:31:33 GMT 2008


I read the summary of Chapter 4 aloud to my non-major students right after we have studied genetic inheritance. It seems to be a very convincing strategy. Now I can give them the website where they can read more, if they want. Thank you so much.Dr. Sheila A. Strawnsstrawn at ucok.edusastrawn@hotmail.com(405) 733-0864


Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:31:51 -0700From: boose at gonzaga.eduTo: laratman47 at yahoo.com; ecoed at ecoed.netCC: Subject: [Ecoed] Re: Origin recommendation:




I agree with Lara and others who find that reading Darwin is not only possible but desirable for undergraduates. True, reading the whole thing may be a bit much (it is, as Darwin says, “one long argument” [emphasis mine]). But it is interesting for the strength and structure of his argument, the concepts and ideas he foreshadowed in his questioning and speculating, and for the number of things he just plain got wrong. I regularly have students read chapters 2 – 4: Variation Under Nature, Struggle for Existence, and Natural Selection. 
 
Lara and others have also mentioned the importance of understanding the context Darwin wrote in. In that regard, I’d like to recommend an interesting and very readable discussion of Alfred Russel Wallace. In the book, “The Song of the Dodo”, author David Quammen has a section called, “The Man Who Knew Islands”. In it, he describes how Wallace’s approach to natural history differed from Darwin’s, and how that approach led him to develop many of the same ideas that Darwin had. The two men were very different, and it is interesting to read Quammen’s comparison. It’s also interesting for students to think about why the two men have been treated so differently by history.
 
Just a thought.
 
David

******************************
David L. Boose, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Biology
Gonzaga University
502 East Boone Avenue
Spokane, WA 99258
(509) 313-6634
boose at gonzaga.edu
 


From: ecoed-bounces at ecoed.net [mailto:ecoed-bounces at ecoed.net] On Behalf Of LaraSent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:07 PMTo: Steve Corso; ecoed at ecoed.netSubject: Re: [Ecoed] Re: Origin recommendation: http://darwin-online.org.uk/
 


In my sophomore undergraduate work at Pomona College, CA

we compared early editions to later ones, in order to note

differences in wording that Darwin made under social pressures

of his time.  While there are only a few changes, they create 

pronounced differences in the way Darwin's theory would be

read, critiqued, and ultimately accepted at least into the 

intellectual body of (scientific) knowledge of the time.

 

At least at the college or grad level, please don't 

water down the study of Darwin's work -- 

thinking about evolution affects how we think about 

relativity, choices, statistics, social and environmental 

challenges of our time.  

 

There are also a couple of terrific (shorter) biographies of Darwin's life that

help to outline and explain the pressures hhe was under, how he lived

his scientific life, and how Wallace's explorations affected Darwin's work.

 

Regards, Lara 


"You must be the change you wishto see in the world." -- Mahatma Gandhi
 
_________________________________________________________________
Search that pays you back! Introducing Live Search cashback.
http://search.live.com/cashback/?&pkw=form=MIJAAF/publ=HMTGL/crea=srchpaysyouback
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ecoed.net/pipermail/ecoed/attachments/20080613/775cf0d6/attachment.htm


More information about the Ecoed mailing list